Every solid test automation framework starts the same way. You pick a clean folder structure. You get your config right once, early, before you have hundreds of tests depending on it. Playwright makes this part refreshingly easy. TypeScript support is built in from day one. You do not need to bolt on extra plugins or wrestle with a transpiler. This post walks through setting up a Playwright project the way I would actually set one up for a real team. Not a toy demo. Something that can grow to hundreds of tests without turning into a mess. ...

Lately, it feels like we’ve hit a real tipping point with web automation. Selenium had a great decade-plus run, but for me, Microsoft Playwright has officially taken over as the go-to tool for modern web testing. It’s just so much faster and smoother to work with. At the same time, I’ve been keeping an eye on the flood of new commercial “low-code” AI test tools popping up everywhere, trying to see if they actually deliver on bridging the gap between manual testing and automated pipelines. ...

The initial novelty of pasting prompts into web browser windows has pretty much worn off. Lately, I’ve been way more interested in how AI fits directly into the everyday coding workflow—mostly tinkering with GitHub Copilot and inline code completions right inside the editor. At the same time, my own approach to test automation has been shifting. I’ve been leaning much harder into API and microservice testing lately, mostly because keeping heavy UI tests reliable as apps change fast is a constant uphill battle. ...

If your group chats look anything like mine lately, they’re probably full of screenshots of ChatGPT spitting out code. Ever since the public launch blew up, I’ve been down a rabbit hole trying to figure out what’s actually useful versus what’s just hype. I wanted to cut through the noise and see how this stuff actually holds up in real life. Is AI going to write whole test suites for us overnight? Definitely not. But can it make the tedious, repetitive stuff a lot less painful right now? 100%. ...

ReadyAPI has inbuilt support for various test management tools. File » Preferences will list down all integration with tools like Jira, Zephyr etc. However, at the time of writing this post, Zephyr Integration is available only with Zephyr Squad and not Zephyr Scale. If your team is using Zephyr Scale, there is no inbuilt integration. I hope this will change in future since both ReadyAPI and Zephyr Scale is owned by same company. ...

In the previous blog post here and here, we saw how to create a functional test case and add assertions to validate the result. ReadyAPI provides many inbuilt assertion methods which will help to easily validate the output response without any coding. However, in real-world usage for test automation, it may not be enough. Consider the scenario where we need to validate the response content has proper values from an expected list. In this example, let us make an assertion to validate, that the status field in the response for making the order is either placed or notplaced. ...

ReadyAPI can be used for testing both SOAP and REST services. Output format of them is mainly XML / JSON. Hence it is important to know how to parse them into corresponding objects. Parsing XML Consider a scenario where output for a SOAP service or JDBC call is returning a XML containing list of person information, which we need to convert to objects. XML format is like below, which available as a response content of a ReadyAPI Step ...

In my previous post here, I mentioned how to do a basic functional test. Sometimes, we might have to do complex flows where we need to call multiple APIs and also iterate the tests with various sets of data. Let us look at one scenario, which involves the below steps. Get details of pet based on PetID If the pet details are retrieved, place an order Iterate the above scenario for different Pet ID ...

Ready API is the rebranded SOAPUI Pro, which can be used for testing both SOAP services and REST services. This is a licensed tool , which offer 14 days free trial for all features. ReadyAPI provides lot for upgrades compared to free open source SoapUI . Major advantages to support functional testing of REST APIs are dynamic data sources, assertion groups, scripting , advanced property transfer etc. Full list of differences between ReadyAPI and Soap UI can be found here . ...

Reflection is the process of describing the metadata of types, methods and fields in a code. It helps to get information about loaded assemblies and elements within it like classes, methods etc. According to microsoft documentation, Reflection provides objects (of type Type) that describe assemblies, modules, and types. You can use reflection to dynamically create an instance of a type, bind the type to an existing object, or get the type from an existing object and invoke its methods or access its fields and properties. If you are using attributes in your code, reflection enables you to access them. ...